Friday, May 1, 2009

Genius


If there's one thing about the whole online chatting thing that annoys me, and there are several, but if I had to choose just one, I would choose "lol." It's hard to place exactly why it bothers me so much, but I'm going to try to explain in this blog post. My faithful readers should appreciate me racking my brains to understand myself for your benefit. I've narrowed it down to a few reasons.

Number 1: First of all, it took me a long time to figure out what "lol" even meant. I first started online chatting with my friends (not random strangers, mind you) when I was a freshman living in Deseret Towers, and when they would type "lol" I never had a clue what they meant. "Lol?" I would type, and then they would have to explain, and I would say, "So, you laughed out loud at what I just said? I didn't think it was that funny." Then I was glad that it was a text conversation, because otherwise things wouldn't have gotten all sorts of awkward.

Number 2: When someone types "lol," I know that they are very rarely actually laughing out loud. There's only one person who I know for sure is doing it, and she is awesome. Incidentally, she is also allowed to type "lol" when she chats with me, being the only one allowed. When chatting with other people, I sometimes let it slide, but my typical response is, "Are you really?" to which they usually reply, "No, I wasn't." That is, once I explain, because they typically don't understand. People just throw that little thing out there really fast without even thinking about what it means. That also bothers me. Am I being a whiner? Maybe. On to the next reason!

Number 3: How lazy are you? I mean, seriously. If someone you're chatting with types something funny, like, say, "Hey, did you know that Chuck Norris was born in a log cabin that he built with his own two hands?" why can't you just type "that's funny!" or "haha!" It really doesn't take that much effort. If you're into chatting on the Internets, I'm hoping that you have the ability to type marginally fast, and if you can't type at least marginally fast, I pity you, poor, unfortunate soul. "Lol" is entirely unnecessary and rather obnoxious, if you ask me. Yes, I'm whining again. On to reason number 4!

Number 4: Okay, so I don't actually have a reason number four, I just wanted a good transition from the last one. In conclusion, "lol" is unnecessary, lazy, and misleading, as it is often a lie. That, and it makes six year olds drop their ice cream cones and cry for hours. Do you want a whole bunch of crying six year olds on your conscience? I know I don't. I rest my case.

6 comments:

  1. I rather like lol, myself. But all of your reasons for disliking it are not only valid, they're true. it is rather disingenuous (put THAT word in your pipe and smoke it!) Ahem, as I was saying, it is rather disingenuous of people to purport to be laughing out loud when they are not. And I also agree that the lack of effort it reveals on the part of the typer, who can't even be bothered to type the four-letter "haha," leaves much to be desired. it's like getting carnations instead of roses.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are dang right. Every time I type LOL, I really am laughing out loud... but i DO laugh a lot...

    ReplyDelete
  3. What about ROTFL (rolling on the floor laughing)? I don't get that one much, but I think as far as obnoxious texting short-hand goes, it takes the cake.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I concur. It makes me think of "A Cinderella Story" when Hillary Duff SAYS 'LOL' as she types it to her prince. Gross.

    ReplyDelete